Friday, October 08, 2004

What's new on The Apprentice

As opposed to Survivor, I was happy to see Pamela go. What made her so sure she was God's gift to the women's team? I don't have a problem with her leadership strategy because, hey, each to their own, but she was SUCH a bitch to them. And then she seemed surprised that they targeted her in the boardroom? Yeah, how shocking. It's one thing to lead but it's another thing to treat them like dirt. I'm not a fan of Stacy's, but she has a point that if you ask her to do the legal work, expect her as a lawyer to do it thoroughly.

Also, last I checked, it was Donald Trump who was hiring someone to work for him, not America. If he wants to fire someone because they act irrationally or because they have a large ego and give up their immunity, well, he's entitled. He needs to choose one person to hire and until that person is chosen, I don't get the crying about the order that the others go. (See here.) I don't think any of the firings have been unjustified. It's a G-A-M-E! Sure, it sucks that Trump put Pamela in that position but you know, oh well. I'm not really sure why he was so taken with Pamela in the first place - didn't she lose the first time she was project manager, too?

Random post script: I loved the behind-the-scenes QVC stuff. I might even watch the guys on Monday night as they try to sell more grills.

No comments: